11 – Structuralism & Post-Structuralism
๐งฉ 1. Structuralism
Basic Idea:
Structuralism says that everything — language, literature, culture — works like a system of structures.
To understand a text, we must study its underlying structure (not just story or characters).
๐ “Meaning is created by structure — not by individual words alone.”
Concepts:
-
Language as a System (Ferdinand de Saussure):
-
He said language is made of signs.
-
Each sign = Signifier + Signified
-
Signifier = word/sound (e.g., “tree”)
-
Signified = idea/concept of tree
-
-
Relationship between them is arbitrary (no natural connection).
-
-
Binary Oppositions (Claude Lรฉvi-Strauss):
-
Myths and stories are built on opposites like:
-
Life / Death
-
Good / Evil
-
Man / Woman
-
-
Structure = how these opposites create meaning.
-
-
Narrative Structure (Tzvetan Todorov, Vladimir Propp):
-
Stories follow patterns: beginning → conflict → resolution.
-
Propp identified 31 narrative functions in folk tales.
-
-
Literature as a System of Codes (Roland Barthes):
-
Literature is a network of signs and meanings.
-
Focus on how meaning is made, not what it means.
-
Thinkers:
-
Ferdinand de Saussure – linguistics foundation
-
Claude Lรฉvi-Strauss – anthropology & myths
-
Roland Barthes – Mythologies, S/Z
-
Roman Jakobson, Tzvetan Todorov, Vladimir Propp
Ex:
In Hamlet, a structuralist studies patterns:
-
Father/son, life/death, action/inaction → opposites that create meaning.
๐ Structuralism studies the structure and system of signs that produce meaning in literature.
๐ 2. Post-Structuralism
Basic Idea:
Post-Structuralism came as a reaction to Structuralism.
It says:
๐ Meaning is not fixed or stable.
๐ Every text can have multiple interpretations.
๐ Language is unreliable — it always shifts meaning.
Concepts:
-
Deconstruction (Jacques Derrida):
-
There is no single meaning — meaning keeps “deferring.”
-
Every text contradicts itself.
-
Famous idea: “There is nothing outside the text.”
-
We should deconstruct (break open) language to see hidden assumptions.
-
-
Death of the Author (Roland Barthes):
-
Once the text is written, the author’s intention no longer matters.
-
The reader gives meaning.
-
Meaning is created in reading, not fixed in writing.
-
-
Discourse and Power (Michel Foucault):
-
Knowledge and power are linked.
-
Who controls language, controls thought.
-
-
Meaning = Play (Derrida’s term Diffรฉrance):
-
“Diffรฉrance” = difference + deferral.
-
Words only have meaning through differences with other words — never final.
-
Main Thinkers:
-
Jacques Derrida – Of Grammatology
-
Roland Barthes – The Death of the Author
-
Michel Foucault – The Archaeology of Knowledge
-
Julia Kristeva – Intertextuality
-
J. Hillis Miller, Paul de Man, Harold Bloom
Ex:
In Hamlet, a post-structuralist says:
-
There is no single truth about Hamlet’s delay.
-
Every explanation opens new contradictions.
-
Text has many meanings, not one.
Structuralism vs Post-Structuralism
| Structuralism | Post-Structuralism | |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Structure & system | Instability of meaning |
| Meaning | Stable, fixed | Shifting, multiple |
| Language | Reliable system | Unstable, contradictory |
| Key Figure | Saussure, Lรฉvi-Strauss | Derrida, Barthes |
| Approach | Scientific, logical | Deconstructive, critical |
| Goal | Find underlying pattern | Show how meaning breaks down |
๐ Structuralism finds structure in text; Post-Structuralism finds how structure collapses.
12 – Deconstruction Theory
(Jacques Derrida)
๐ง What is Deconstruction?
Deconstruction is a post-structuralist theory developed by Jacques Derrida.
It says that language never gives a single, fixed meaning — instead, meaning always changes depending on context.
๐
“Every text has many meanings, and those meanings contradict each other.”
๐งฉ :
-
We think language is stable — but it’s not.
-
Words get meaning only through difference from other words.
-
So, there’s no final or true meaning — only play of meanings.
๐
1. Diffรฉrance
-
A term coined by Derrida (French word mixing difference and deferral).
-
It means:
-
Words get meaning by being different from others.
-
Meaning is deferred (never complete — always postponed).
-
-
So, when you read, you never reach a final truth — meaning keeps changing.
๐️ Ex:
The word light means “not dark” or “not heavy” — it depends on other words.
So its meaning is never self-contained, always relative.
2. Logocentrism
-
Western philosophy believes in a “center” of meaning — truth, reason, God, or author.
-
Derrida rejected this — he said there is no center.
-
Every “truth” is made of language, and language is unstable.
๐️ Ex:
People used to think the author’s intention = meaning.
Derrida says: No — the text speaks beyond the author.
3. Binary Oppositions
-
Western thought is built on opposites:
-
Light / Dark
-
Man / Woman
-
Speech / Writing
-
Good / Evil
-
-
Derrida said these opposites are hierarchical (one is considered superior).
-
Deconstruction breaks this hierarchy — shows both sides depend on each other.
๐️ Ex:
“Speech is pure, writing is secondary” → Derrida says writing also shapes speech.
4. There is Nothing Outside the Text
-
Famous Derrida quote: “Il n’y a pas de hors-texte.”
-
Meaning: everything is interpreted through language and culture — there is no pure meaning outside the text.
5. Textuality
-
A text is not a closed system — it has no final boundary.
-
Reading = re-creating meaning each time.
๐งฉ :
-
Find binary oppositions (life/death, male/female, etc.).
-
Show how the “superior” term depends on the “inferior” one.
-
Expose contradictions or gaps in meaning.
-
Prove that the text undoes its own claims.
Ex:
In Hamlet:
-
Binary: action vs inaction
-
We think Hamlet is weak (inaction), but his thinking (inaction) is his strength — it reverses the opposition.
That’s deconstruction — showing hidden contradictions.
๐ง Main Theorists:
-
Jacques Derrida – founder (Of Grammatology, Writing and Difference)
-
Paul de Man – deconstructive readings of Romantic poetry
-
J. Hillis Miller – Yale School of Deconstruction
-
Geoffrey Hartman, Harold Bloom – Yale critics
๐
Deconstruction reveals how texts contradict themselves and how meaning is never fixed but always shifting.
๐
| Concept | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Diffรฉrance | Meaning through difference; never final |
| Logocentrism | Belief in a fixed truth; Derrida rejects it |
| Binary Opposition | Two opposing ideas; deconstruction reverses hierarchy |
| Nothing outside the text | Meaning exists only through language |
| Main Goal | Show instability of language and meaning |
Comments
Post a Comment
If You have any doubts, Please let me know